Lead-Wise

PURPOSE & IMPACT

Continuing Interactions and Inputs from AI

I’ve tried to continue to gather inputs from AI regarding personal branding and consulting work. These interactions can be very valuable, especially for individual consultants.

I recently asked Google AI and Chatgpt regarding consolidated feedback on my work.

This was Google AI’s output regarding feedback. I loved the term in the second bullet – “Thought Integrator”.

Chatgpt’s output regarding feedback was interesting and different. Here’s the overall assessment.

In addition to offering more thoughts about developing a consulting value proposition, it also offered to propose/develop a signature framework for me, based on our previous interactions. This held interesting food for reflection.

It also proposed priority customer segments to target.

How would you build useful interactions with your AI partner?

Distance To Irrelevance

There are some things that stay in our memories for long periods of time and keep coming back over the years as reminders.

These are a couple of magazine covers that serve as valuable reminders to stay humble when success and recognitions seem to be flowing from many directions. They also remind us how quickly things can change and the same sources that sang praises would share analyses on what went wrong.

They remind me about the “Halo Effect” (also, a book written by IMD professor, Phil Rosenzweig), especially about all the attention/praise/positive hypotheses received when things seem to be going well in the eyes of the external world and, how quickly people and organisations can be forgotten soon after, analysed for the fall and become the subject of ‘what went wrong’ case studies.

From a leadership point of view, it is extremely important to remind yourself to stay continuously humble, curious, counter the feeling of “hubris born of success” (borrowed from Jim Collin’s Five Stages of Decline), have gratitude for the luck/blessings that comes your way, and remind yourself that the distance to irrelevance may not be that far. This is important for leaders in any sector.

At an individual level, when it happens unfortunately, resilience becomes critical.

Reflections On A Good Life (Essay by Dr. Manfred Kets de Vries)

There are some papers, essays, articles and books that stay in our minds for a long time. They keep coming back to our thoughts. This happens mainly because of a strong interest in the topic, great balance of author’s thinking, well written, reference to studies/data and invites deep reflection. A recent essay that I found very interesting to read and reflect on is “The good-enough life: how to live before the curtain falls” by Manfred Kets de Vries (distinguished clinical professor of leadership development, psychoanalyst). I’ve revisited this essay few times and would recommend to everyone. These are notes that got me thinking deeply and may get you there as well.

—
* The first mistake we make about the good life is assuming it must be a happy one. Happiness, however, behaves like an unreliable employee: it arrives late, leaves early, and vanishes the instant we ask whether it is still on the premises.
* A life devoted entirely to duty soon becomes joyless; a life devoted entirely to pleasure becomes curiously empty, as many lottery winners and heirs discover when they learn that money can purchase almost anything except a self.
* The good life, then, concerns something beneath one’s mood: meaning, relationship, agency, contribution, curiosity, some negotiated peace with oneself, a way of inhabiting one’s own existence, the way a tenant inhabits a flat he intends to renovate later, indefinitely.
* The greatest obstacle to living well is rarely the hostility of the world. It is our magnificent, tireless capacity to misrepresent, to ourselves, what we actually want.

* Modern civilization has produced an elegant answer to the ancient question of the good life: more.
* The tragedy is that desire has no factory-installed stopping mechanism. What delighted us yesterday soon becomes part of the scenery, while our expectations quietly rise to erase the difference.
* Whose desire is this? Many of the things we want with such ferocity were never entirely ours.
* Achievement can become compulsive…

* Every human being lives simultaneously in two kinds of theatre productions: the external play of jobs, marriages, quarterly results, and an internal theatre whose cast includes parents, other family members, rivals, former lovers and assorted villains, several dead for decades and nonetheless maintaining excellent attendance.
* We recreate variations of unfinished emotional dramas, hoping unconsciously for a different ending, and receiving, with metronomic reliability, the
same one.
* A good life requires psychological archaeology: sifting which parts of our
lives represent genuine choice and which are old scripts in new costumes.

* Perhaps the good life begins when we become the authors of our lives rather than actors reciting lines handed down…
* Maturity is not the disappearance of our neuroses. It is becoming acquainted with them, knowing where they live, and revoking their keys to the house, even as they continue to ring the doorbell at inconvenient hours. This requires tolerating ambivalence: accepting that the same person can be loving and infuriating, admirable and disappointing.
* Mature love begins precisely where possession ends, at the humbling moment when we accept…
* A good relationship demands two seemingly contradictory capacities: attachment and separateness.

* Meaningful work gives shape to time and lets us deposit something of ourselves into the world before the account closes. But work has a dangerous habit of becoming one’s complete identity rather than expressing part of it. The danger begins the moment role and self, become indistinguishable.
* Remove the props, and an alarming question surfaces: who am I when nobody is obliged to return my calls?
* Work, however, should express a life. It should not consume it.

* Perhaps the rarest psychological achievement available to a modern human is learning the meaning of enough. But this sounds simple until we survey how many lives are organized around its opposite. The finish line moves because we keep moving it, telling ourselves each relocation is the last.
* But enough is not resignation dressed as humility. It is liberation from compulsive striving.

* Think of ‘meaning’ as resting on five interlocking dimensions: purpose, belonging, competence, control/ agency and transcendence.
* Purpose asks where I am going, and why. Belonging asks to whom I belong. Competence asks whether I can do something that matters, reasonably well. Control or agency asks whether I have authorship over my own life. Transcendence asks what connects me to something larger than myself. These dimensions need one another. Meaning is not a trophy to be displayed with the others; it emerges from the weave, not from any single thread.
* Beneath all five sit older questions. Who am I? To whom do I matter? What will remain when I am gone?

* Our happiness culture harbors a dangerous assumption: that suffering is evidence that something has gone wrong. But suffering is written into the original contract.
* We will lose people we love. Children will choose lives we did not design for them. Beauty will fade. No philosophy abolishes any of this.
* A good life is not a life without loss; it is a life capable of absorbing loss without losing, along with it, the capacity to keep living. Meaning does not abolish suffering, but it can alter our relationship to it.
* Become absorbed instead in people and purposes that genuinely matter, and happiness occasionally wanders in, uninvited, and stays a while.
* The good life requires not merely knowing what to pursue but, with equal clarity, what to relinquish.

* When time ceases to feel infinite, trivialities become more obviously, mercifully trivial.
* The Stoics, the existentialists and the psychoanalysts arrive, by different roads, at a shared insight: limits give a life its shape. If time were infinite, almost nothing would carry urgency. The good life therefore requires not merely knowing what to pursue but, with equal clarity, what to relinquish.
* Growing older well is, in large part, becoming an editor of one’s own life.

* We cannot defeat mortality. But we can participate in continuity.
* Erikson’s final developmental tension sits between ego integrity and despair. Can I look back at my own life, at its mistakes, its absurdities, its wrong turns, and nevertheless conclude: yes, that was my life, and I can accept it? Not because it all went well. Because it was, undeniably, lived.

* The capacity for purposeless absorption is one of the clearest signs that a person has escaped, at least temporarily, the tyranny of performance.
* People unable to laugh at themselves remain dangerously dependent on the fiction of their own importance, a fiction that requires constant maintenance and never quite passes an honest audit. The capacity to laugh at ourselves allows us to acknowledge our own foolishness without being annihilated by the acknowledgment.

* A life worth living is one in which we manage to love and be loved, become reasonably ourselves, remain curious, do work that means something to us, contribute beyond the perimeter of our own interests, tolerate life’s inevitable losses without being frozen by them, retain some capacity for play, and look back with more gratitude than regret.
* The good life is not the perfect life; a perfect life would, on inspection, be close to intolerable. There would be no surprises, no foolish mistakes, no improbable recoveries, and no stories worth telling at dinner…contains people we should never have met and people without whom the rest of it is unimaginable. It contains roads not taken, and several roads we took and deeply regret.
* What makes a life good is not that everything turns out well; almost nothing, on close inspection, does. It is that, gradually and with considerable resistance, we become capable of turning toward reality instead of away from it.


* Then, inevitably, the curtain begins its descent. There is no negotiating an extension with the management, however senior one’s title.
* The tragedy is that the play ends. The comedy is how much of the run we spent anxiously reading the reviews instead of performing the play.
* Perhaps a life worth living consists, finally, in discovering this early enough to stop rehearsing for an audience that was never there, and to start, before the lights come down, actually enjoying the performance.
—

Continuing to experiment with AI

I’ve continued to experiment with ChatGPT, especially on the personal branding aspects. It has been quite interesting to explore the image creation, personal branding support elements there now. This has become so convenient to build for anyone and, probably only a small indication of the scope. Sharing some examples – what do you think?

Experimenting with my own poster/brand with AI

After observing a post on LinkedIn, I thought it would be interesting to experiment with Chatgpt, with my own poster and branding. This was an interesting output from that exercise. It seemed to be based on the interactions and knowledge that Chatgpt gathered from previous discussions as well.

This seems to be a great example of how AI can help individuals by consolidating multiple perspectives and with a great presentation.

Valuable notes on Career Transitions

I was going through the 2023 Harvard Business Review article by London Business School professor, Herminia Ibarra and thought the following notes are valuable to share. These provide valuable advices and notes for reflection in a fast changing world of work.

* With increasing frequency, we are changing jobs and careers, pursuing opportunities and making time for rest and restoration.
* Need to learn how to make the most of the frequent transitions.
* You’re likely to experience the transition as an emotionally fraught process.
* Change is hard primarily because of the lack of institutional support and loss of professional identity.
* Usually, we fail to change because we don’t know how to go about it.
* Emotionally, career change is a roller coaster ride because it puts you in a “liminal state” – where you must navigate between a past that’s over and a future that’s uncertain.
* You must embrace liminality. You have to be willing to get and stay lost for a while.
* 3 ways to make that process easier – experiment with divergent possibilities while delaying commitment to any one of them, adopt ‘either-or’ thinking (exploring while maintaining something, at least initially), and building new connections and relationships of kindred spirits.
* We all need a secure base from which to explore the unknown and turn painful feelings/experiences into sources of growth.
* Self-reflecting out loud” is important. We need to get comfortable with the “learning plot” – our story of ongoing struggle and adaptation. As constant reinvention becomes the norm, the stories that define us have no start or ending.
* Proficiency in being liminal will increase your capacity to successfully navigate present and future transitions.

Source:
Why Career Transition Is So Hard; Herminia Ibarra; Harvard Business Review; November-December 2023

Counter-programming Against Your Inner Critic

Many of us tend to be tough on ourselves, probably more than on others. This approach seems to intensify in corporate environments because of constant judgment scenarios. I noticed an interesting Ted talk, that brought out a personal experience journey, along with the related improvements in a light manner. In today’s world, the message seems very relevant to many people, with valuable food for reflection and application. Practicing the “loving-kindness” meditation statement seems valuable to experiment with and apply practically.

Here are some selected valuable notes from the talk.

* “If I wanted to be less of a jerk to other people, I needed to start by being less of a jerk to myself…”
* “All the ways in which I was torturing myself showed up in my relationships with other people. And as those relationships suffered, so did I.”
* Meditation statement while focusing on others – “May you be happy, may you be safe, may you be healthy, may you live with ease.”
* Start consciously counterprogramming against your inner critic.
* Research shows that the process of replacing your sadistic inner tyrant with a supportive inner coach, who has high standards but is not a jerk about it, makes you more likely to reach your goals.

Psychological Safety in Organizational AI Transformations

A recent IMD business school article highlights the importance of psychological safety in organizational AI transformation, based on related experiences, from Kameshwari Rao, Global Chief People Officer at international digital consulting firm Publicis Sapient. This also provides useful notes for leaders who are thinking about or working through AI related transformations.

These are selected notes from the article.

* Organizations need a psychologically safe environment for their employees to innovate and experiment.
* Unless employees feel psychologically safe, it is unrealistic to expect them to engage with, let alone embrace, the technology. Inevitably, user hesitation will impede organizational efforts to explore AI.
* Important to remember that “People’s identities are at stake”.
* Human intelligence has been evolving for hundreds of thousands of years, developing characteristics such as empathy, resilience, and judgment to adapt to a changing environment. The role of leaders is to remind people that they possess those irreplaceable human qualities.
* Requires businesses to commit to increased communication and support that considers each employee’s personal reaction to the technology and allows them to adapt at their own pace.

* Publicis Sapient focused on three simultaneous strands of AI change:
1. the shift to a mindset of curiosity rather than anxiety about AI,
2. building confidence, and
3. integrating AI tools into everyday jobs.

* “We wanted to begin the conversation by getting everybody to have a bit of fun with AI. It was about building familiarity.”
* The town hall was followed with a dedicated campaign, AI Habits, where the goal was to pique curiosity, with initiatives based on psychological research into habit formation.
* At the same time, Publicis Sapient prioritized experimentation, getting people to think about the skills and training they might need to make the most of AI. One useful approach here was gamification. 
* Note that companies should not see these three AI initiatives as one-and-done exercises: “At any given point, you will have people at different stages in all three areas – everyone’s change cycle is different.”
* Leaders have framed AI as an ongoing learning journey.
* Listening, sharing – a range of listening tools that Publicis Sapient uses to understand whether employees are feeling confident in the workplace. Leaders, starting with the CEO, also serve as role models, share their own anxieties.
* No single initiative will create psychological safety around AI. Rather, it will take a spread of different, ongoing measures. 

Source: Publicis Sapient on AI: A three-step guide to psychological safety; IMD; June 8, 2026

Notes on Organisational Political Dynamics and the Concept of Dominant Coalition

I noticed some interesting, practical notes regarding ‘organisational political dynamics’, from the new book, The Age of HR. Since this was relatable from past experiences and valuable to reflect on, I thought of sharing. Have you been able to observe dominant coalitions in your organisations?


These notes are from Chapter 59 – To Be or Not to Be Part of the Dominant Coalition as the CHRO: Understanding the Political Dynamics of Your Organisation and How to Deal with Them, written by Dirk Buyens, Koen Dewettinck, and Silke Van Gansbeke

—
* It is helpful to recognise that politics and political behaviour are an inherent part of organisational life.
* In Darwinian terms, ‘survival of the fittest’ in this context often means those who are able to adapt best to the political environment are often the winners. 
* In executive committees, we once again observe striking differences in who truly has influence and who does not.

* The dominant coalition can be defined as the group of individuals who, relative to their peers, exert a disproportionate level of influence over organisational decisions. Every company contains employees who, over time, gravitate towards the centre of decision-making in the organisation.
* In practice, dominant coalitions are rarely secretive. Most employees are aware of who belongs to them, and very often it is functionally driven.

* For a CHRO, it is crucial to understand what we refer to as the paradox of the right strategy. The ‘right’ strategy is typically one chosen that delivers quick wins soon. Even if an alternative strategy might have produced superior long-term outcomes, this can never be proven. Challenging the dominant coalition on this basis is therefore futile and politically suicidal.

* The fundamental question CHROs must ask is: “How important is it for me to be part of the dominant coalition, and what price am I willing to pay?”
* Being part of the dominant coalition as a CHRO ensures that HR processes and policies are taken seriously when key decisions are made. The downside is that HR may be perceived as less neutral, undermining the role of the credible activist.
* Remaining outside the dominant coalition enhances perceived neutrality but risks HR initiatives being dismissed as mere exercises that aren’t taken seriously when it truly matters. 
* Ultimately, successfully sensing and navigating dominant coalitions requires strong political skills from the CHRO. 
* There must be a balance between the degree to which an organisation tolerates political behaviour and one’s own personal tolerance for it.
* Some CHROs are dismissed for being too naïve; others for being overly political. In all cases, dominant coalitions – and how CHROs engage with them – profoundly shape their careers. Purposeful self-management is therefore indispensable.
* Until CHROs navigate the political nature of organisations, they will continue to be limited in their impact. 
—

Understanding Country Culture Link to General Behaviours and Approaches

Understanding the different dimensions of country cultures could often help clarify behaviours, ways of working, approaches and interactions better. That of course would not answer everything. There are always personality elements, professionalism/maturity levels, individual styles and sub cultures at play, in interactions.

A couple of recent related news items got me thinking about this topic. A journalist from Norway asked a question, which a diplomat from India answered, and both parties did not seem engaged or happy with their style or approaches in interactions. These sort of frustrations in interactions can be seen in the global workplace often. I think that at least a good portion of the frustration stems from the difference in their cultural contexts.

I gathered the following, selected notes from the The Culture Factor Group, Culture Dimensions Country Comparison tool – which compares India and Norway. Having lived and worked in Scandinavia for many years, I can see why it would be easy to misunderstand or ‘not get’ someone on the either side. The Culture Dimensions structure inputs originated from the late Prof. Geert Hofstede’s research. He was one of the most well-known experts in comparative intercultural research. These cross cultural inputs are updated through research notes periodically by the Culture Factor group.

According to inputs from the tool, major culture dimension differences exist between India and Norway in three out of the six dimensions – Power Distance, Individualism and Motivation towards Achievement and Success. Selected notes on these dimensions are included below. Hope this will help in thinking about the topic more deeper.


« Older posts

© 2026 Lead-Wise

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑